---
title: "Easysearch VS Opensearch 数据写入与存储性能对比"
date: 2025-03-24
lastmod: 2025-03-24
description: "本文对比 Easysearch 和 Opensearch 数据写入和数据存储方面的性能。"
tags: ["Easysearch", "Opensearch"]
summary: "本文记录 Easysearch 和 Opensearch 数据写入和数据存储方面的性能对比。
准备 #    压测工具：INFINI Loadgen
  对比版本：
   Easysearch 1.11.1（lucene 8.11.4） Opensearch 2.19.1（lucene 9.12.1）  节点 JVM 配置：1G  数据写入 #  压测命令：
./loadgen-linux-amd64 -c 20 -d 300 Opensearch #  PUT infinilabs { "settings": { "number_of_shards": "1", "number_of_replicas": 0, "index.refresh_interval": "120s", "translog": { "durability": "async", "sync_interval": "120s" } } } Easysearch #  PUT infinilabs { "settings": { "number_of_shards": "1", "number_of_replicas": 0, "index."
---


本文记录 Easysearch 和 Opensearch 数据写入和数据存储方面的性能对比。

## 准备

1. 压测工具：INFINI Loadgen

2. 对比版本：

- Easysearch 1.11.1（lucene 8.11.4）
- Opensearch 2.19.1（lucene 9.12.1）

3. 节点 JVM 配置：1G

## 数据写入

压测命令：

```shell
./loadgen-linux-amd64 -c 20 -d 300
```

### Opensearch

```plain
PUT infinilabs
{
  "settings": {
    "number_of_shards": "1",
    "number_of_replicas": 0,
    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",
    "translog": {
      "durability": "async",
      "sync_interval": "120s"
    }
  }
}
```

{{% load-img "/img/blog/2025/easysearch-vs-opensearch-performance-comparison/01.png" "" %}}

### Easysearch

```plain
PUT infinilabs
{
  "settings": {
    "number_of_shards": "1",
    "number_of_replicas": 0,
    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",
    "translog": {
      "durability": "async",
      "sync_interval": "120s"
    }
  }
}
```

{{% load-img "/img/blog/2025/easysearch-vs-opensearch-performance-comparison/02.png" "" %}}

## 数据存储

压测命令：

```shell
./loadgen-linux-amd64 -c 20 -d 600 -l 10000
```

### Opensearch: zstd 压缩

```plain
PUT infinilabs
{
  "settings": {
    "number_of_shards": "1",
    "number_of_replicas": 0,
    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",
    "translog": {
      "durability": "async",
      "sync_interval": "120s"
    },
    "index.codec": "zstd"
  }
}
```

{{% load-img "/img/blog/2025/easysearch-vs-opensearch-performance-comparison/03.png" "" %}}

{{% load-img "/img/blog/2025/easysearch-vs-opensearch-performance-comparison/04.png" "" %}}

### Easysearch: zstd + source_reuse 压缩

```plain
PUT infinilabs
{
  "settings": {
    "number_of_shards": "1",
    "number_of_replicas": 0,
    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",
    "translog": {
      "durability": "async",
      "sync_interval": "120s"
    },
    "index.codec": "ZSTD",
    "index.source_reuse": "true"
  }
}
```

{{% load-img "/img/blog/2025/easysearch-vs-opensearch-performance-comparison/05.png" "" %}}

{{% load-img "/img/blog/2025/easysearch-vs-opensearch-performance-comparison/06.png" "" %}}

## 结论

1. 数据写入方面，Easysearch（lucene 8.x） 和 Opensearch（lucene 9.x）基本持平；
2. 数据存储方面，相同数据量经过 Easysearch 和 Opensearch 的压缩后，Easysearch 占用的空间明显少于 Opensearch，并且数据量越大越明显。